Chinese town officials trying to attract hawks, wolves to get rid of rats

Tanggulashan town officials have come up with a unique plan to kill grassland-destroying rats. They have erected about 830 bird perches to attract hawks and wolves, which in turn can kill the rats, reports China Daily.

The town, referred to as the “first town of the Yangtze River source”, has been struggling with the problem, leading to desertification.

In 1998, the local government started to wipe out the rats with a chemical called rodenticide. But it had a negative impact on the grassland. The government recently came up with the idea to attract hawks and wolves to kill the rats.

bron: www.dnaindia.com

Johnson: Chinese reality show prompts look at race

A recent CNN.com feature titled “Growing up Black in China” offered a personal account of how Lou Jing (娄婧), a former reality show contestant with an African-American father, is dealing with the racial controversy she sparked this summer.

Jessica Johnson

Lou was thrust into China’s national spotlight while competing on the show “Go! Oriental Angel” (加油!东方天使) due to her dark brown skin, which obviously made her stand out from the other girls. Lou, who is only 20 years old, told CNN her experience on the “American Idol”-style program was the first time in her life that she felt different.
She has never met her father, so she considers herself completely Chinese. She had a normal childhood with friends who accepted her and even tried to console her when she began to question why she was darker.
[Jessica Johnson]

Lou definitely needed that comfort again when malicious and hateful comments concerning her mixed parentage were spewed over the internet.

Since the social construction of race that we have formulated in the West is relatively new to China, Lou’s ordeal on “Go! Oriental Angel” provides an interesting analysis of how the Chinese are tackling racial issues as their country has become more diverse. China’s economic rise has resulted in more foreigners moving into cities and a greater influence of American popular culture. I’ve learned more about this cultural shift from my Chinese students in the pop culture and English composition classes I’ve taught.

My pop culture course examines racial and gender themes in American music, film and television, and my Chinese students have been extremely interested in cultural similarities along gender lines, but have been reluctant to talk about race. In one of my class discussions on music and reality shows this year, they did not mention their country’s reaction to Lou, but pointed out the experience of Li Yuchun, a 2005 contestant on another “Idol”-like show called “Super Girl,” later renamed “Happy Girls.”

The disapproval that many Chinese expressed towards Li centered on her boyish appearance – she sported short, spiked hair and wore no makeup. My students stressed that Li’s popularity challenged China’s “conventional gender norms” and prompted former Minister of Culture Liu Zhongde to criticize “Super Girls” as “poison for youth” and “a disgrace to art.”

Although many Chinese were uncomfortable with Li’s tomboyish look, she won the “Super Girl” competition and gained a huge following among younger viewers.

From what I’ve read so far about Lou, it will take some Chinese a little longer to accept her. One of the racial similarities in China and America that is evident from Lou’s experience on “Go! Oriental Angel” is that the dominant physical characteristics of individuals with mixed heritage determine how they are racially classified. Because of her dark skin, Lou will never be accepted by some Chinese as completely Chinese.

In America, people with African American and white parentage often choose to label themselves according to the racial group they most resemble. For example, actress Halle Berry, whose mother is white, has explained that it was easier for her to identify herself as black due to how she looks. Her decision was most likely based on the fact that when people have tried to step out of the rigid racial boxes we’ve constructed in America, the reaction is often one of ridicule and scorn.

When Tiger Woods called himself a “Cablinasian” – a contraction of Caucasian, black, American Indian and Asian – on “Oprah” 12 years ago after winning his first Masters golf tournament, he attempted to highlight his Asian and African American heritage. Yet, many blacks thought Woods was ashamed of his skin color and accused him of downplaying his influence on black children. Woods’ current marital scandal has resulted in what some consider a racially indifferent response from African Americans.

China’s racial issues are not as complex as ours since the country is mostly a homogenous population. However, as Lou’s story has broadened the discussion on race, it will be interesting to see how issues of multiculturalism are addressed in the future.

My Chinese students did eventually share with me that prejudice in China is rooted in class achievement in addition to ethnic background, so as the nation begins to grapple with the latter, they will have to examine what it really means to be Chinese today.

Jessica Johnson, a 1987 graduate of Clarke Central High School, is a correspondent for the Columbus (Ohio) Dispatch and an adjunct professor at Columbus State Community College.

bron: www.onlineathens.com [26-12-2009]

____________________________________________________________________________________________

We of Wocview know that this issue is highly debated by Chinese netizens, and therefore we did some research and compiled a comprehensive but indepth summary of different viewpoints.

Chinese netizens critisized Lou Jing (娄婧) for 5 reasons:

1) Her mother, a Shanghainese-Chinese woman had a sexual relation with an African-American, and got abandoned when she got pregnant. Which adds to an existing stereotype of African or dark tinted people, and implicates sideways to her mother’s poor choice of men or even loose morals. (Strangely enough; if her father was Caucasian this would have been considered normal). There is however another report which says: Lou Jing was the result of an illicit affair she had with an African-American man some 20 years ago. Ms Lou’s mother, who is a Shanghainese and known only as Madam Lou, said her Chinese husband divorced her when he found their newborn looked African instead of Chinese.

2) To conceive before marriage and give a birth to the child who has no father is considered disgraceful in China. Besides, there is a Chinese proverb: 家丑不可外扬 (do not spill out the shame of your family to outside), but yet Lou Jing told the public of her family in a tv-show, and that her intention was to find her father. This announcement outraged many Chinese, who think she is shameless and want to boost her popularity by such an action to get more votes. Whether this is a misunderstanding or not, only Lou Jing knows.

3) Once she said: “my father is an American, not an African”, this sentence makes many people think she looks down on the Africans, and her makes moral quality suspicious. Maybe she just thought to be an American is better to be an African, who knows…

4) Some people are skeptical about her origin, because if her father is an American, she could easily get the US nationality. Why did she opt to stay in China? A few people even speculate that her father fits perfectly in the stereotype of an irresponsible African man, but she pretends to have an American father just for showing off.

5) Many Chinese netizens also dislike the notion that foreigners consider Chinese women an “easy catch”. And this case proves once more that not only the “white devils” (Laowai), but also black people get an easy shot at Chinese women, who are known for applying a “double standard” when it comes to non-Chinese vs Chinese partners. Where the latter one clearly suffers in having a hard time finding a partner where the man-woman ratio in China is very bad from a male perspective. Many Chinese netizens critisize the lack of self respect of Chinese girls when it comes down to the choice of a foreign partner compared to a Chinese one.

Another part of the netizens do think that Lou Jing is treated too harshly. For a little girl to endure so much criticism, while most of the blame should have gone to her mother. Even so, the racial discomfort about foreigners is only verbal, hate crimes/attacks based on race never happen in China. You never see a Chinese guy attacking a foreigner just because his skin color is different, while these sort of hate crimes happens daily in for example America, Australia, Germany, the Netherlands and England.

Chinese women gets 3 year sentence for kidnapping baby ‘for fun’!

A Chinese woman has been given a three-year prison sentence for kidnapping her neighbours 9-month-old son in May.

The neighbour had asked Zhao, 28, to watch the infant while she was away for a few hours on May 22.

Zhao took the baby and fled town, reports the China Daily.

And weeks later, she was arrested from a hostel in Anyang, Henan province.

She told a court in Beijing that she had no motives of making a profit from kidnapping the baby.  “I did it because I thought it would be fun,” she said.

bron: www.littleabout.com (ANI)

Beautiful sculpturs on Chinese ice and snowfestival

In China the annual ‘Harbin International Ice and Snow Festival’ is about to start, one of the biggest ice and snow festivals in the world. The festival began in1965 in the Chinese city Harbin. During the Cultural Revolution, the festival was suspended for a few years, but since 1985 this yearly tradition was revived. This coming edition with the 26th.

At this moment, everybody is working hard to get the details done on these gigantic sculptures to get them ready for the grand opening on January 5th, 2010. And while the sculptures aren’t finished yet, the recent update of them look stunning. The exposition will be available for the public for one month.

bron: www.demorgen.be [18-12-2009] (vbd)

Shaolin Temple report denied

The local government in charge of China’s famous kung fu shrine has denied a report it is pushing the Shaolin Temple to offer shares in a public company in 2011.

The fabled monastery, immortalised in countless martial arts films, has become a high-profile commercial entity in recent years, profiting handsomely from millions of tourists, as well as international stage shows, film production and even e-stores.

“The report about Shaolin Temple’s IPO and ’selling state assets at a low price’ is absolutely untrue,” the government of Dengfeng, where the temple is based, said in a statement. Dengfeng acknowledged that it was negotiating with China Travel International on a new tourism joint venture in the Songshan mountains, home to the Shaolin Temple, but said no formal agreement had been made.

bron: www.rthk.org.hk [18-12-2009]

China Builds Underground ‘Great Wall’ Against Nuke Attack

The Chinese Army is believed to have built an underground “Great Wall” that stretches for more than 5,000 km in the Hebei region of northern China. Citing the People’s Liberation Army’s official newsletter, the Ta Kung Pao daily of Hong Kong on Saturday said China’s strategic missile squadron, the Second Artillery Division, built a massive underground tunnel to conceal nuclear weapons, including the Dongfeng 5 intercontinental ballistic missile with a range of 13,000 km.

Since 1995, the Second Artillery Division has mobilized tens of thousands of soldiers to build a network of tunnels stretching for more than 5,000 km below the mountain regions of Hebei, China’s state-run CCTV reported. “A missile base has been built hundreds of meters underground and can withstand several nuclear attacks,” CCTV said. “People refer to the network of tunnels connecting to the missile base as the ‘Underground Great Wall.’” In March 2008, CCTV broadcast a documentary which revealed that the PLA had been building underground facilities enabling it to launch a counterstrike in case of a nuclear attack.

Taiwan’s Asia-Pacific Defense Magazine also said, “The early version of China’s mid- to long-range missiles had all been deployed above ground and were vulnerable to detection by spy satellites and attacks by interceptor missiles. That prompted the Chinese military to move all of their missiles hundreds of meters underground.” As a result, the squadrons of the PLA deployed there are completely undetectable because they are based in subterranean bunkers and move around beneath the surface.

The purpose of the secretly constructed underground Great Wall is to give China a second chance after a nuclear attack, military experts said. The main objective of the Second Artillery Division is to be able to launch a counterattack against enemy targets after escaping the first volley of attacks. The Ta Kung Pao daily reported that it was unprecedented for the PLA’s newsletter to reveal classified information about the tunnels and that this demonstrates Beijing’s confidence in its military power.

bron: english.chosun.com [14-12-2009]

Another acid attack in Hong Kong; may lead to more CCTV

The authorities say they may consider setting up closed circuit television cameras on rooftops in Causeway Bay, after an acid attack in the shopping area on Saturday night left six people injured. The Chief Executive, Donald Tsang, expressed anger at the latest attack, and said police would spare no effort in tracking down the culprit.

Mr Tsang admitted to reporters after visiting the scene of the acid attack this morning, that it will not be easy to catch the perpetrator. However, police are already chasing up leads in the case.

They have identified some similarities between the latest attack and a raft of earlier incidents in Mong Kok. In all cases, a plastic bottle of corrosive acid was thrown from a similar location – an old building – onto a busy pedestrianised area in the evening.

The Undersecretary for Security, Lai Tung-Kwok, called on the public to come forward with any information, and added that authorities will consider setting up rooftop cameras in Causeway Bay – just as they have done in Mong Kok – even though 100 percent coverage, he said, will be impossible.

bron: www.rthk.org.hk

Chinese girl has rusty needle removed from her head after 11 years

Doctors believe relatives may have attempted to murder a baby girl by jamming a needle into her head. Her death would have allowed the parents to try again under the strict “one couple, one child” family planning policy.

Yang Xiaohui, The mother of a girl who has had a needle removed from her brain in China, looks at her daughter's X-ray
But the little girl, who is 11, did not die. This week, doctors took her into surgery and removed the needle that they believe was the cause of the child’s mental disabilities.

Kuang Yongqin, deputy director of the neurosurgery department at a military hospital in the southwestern city of Chengdu, led the operation. He said afterwards: “This is evil.” He cited a saying common in the countryside that sticking a needle into the head will result in death.

The mother of Pingping (not her real name) said she had reported the case to the police and was planning to bring charges against family members who may have been responsible for the attempted murder of her daughter. Police had advised the mother, Yang Xiaohui, to keep the needle as well as a scan that showed the object buried in the head of her daughter.

Ms Yang said she had been under great pressure to give birth to a son when she married Pingping’s father since he already had a daughter by his first wife. She aborted her first foetus after it was found to be a girl amid pressure from her mother-in-law. However, she went ahead and gave birth to Pingping.

She remembered that the baby barely cried after she was born, and then screamed non-stop for the entire fourth day of her life. She also ran a high fever and has been troubled by unexplained fevers ever since.

The couple moved to the booming east coast five years ago to work in the factories that are China’s workshop to the world and took their daughter to hospital when she had a very high temperature of 40C (104F). The doctors told her that they had found metal in her head.

Ms Yang called her mother-in-law to ask her advice. The elder woman said: “How could she survive so long with metal in the head?” Ms Yang regarded that response as reasonable and made no further inquiries to the hospital, knowing that any surgery would be hugely costly in a country that offers no social welfare for rural residents.

Now, Ms Yang said, she deeply regrets waiting all this time.. Instead, she did her best to teach her daughter to walk and to speak simple words such as “Mummy” and “Daddy”. But Pingping has the mental age of a child of 3.

It was only when she tried to register her daughter at a kindergarten that doctors told her they had found a clear image of a needle inside her daughter’s brain and piercing a main blood vessel.

The needle was so firmly embedded in Pingping’s head and so rusty that doctors estimated it had been in place for at least ten years. They could not pull it out but had to remove it by slowly twisting it.

Hospital medical staff told The Times that Pingping was doing well, but it was unlikely she would recover from her mental disability.

Under China’s strict “one-child” family planning policy, the traditional cultural and economic preference for a son to carry on the family line remains strong, especially in the vast and poor countryside. The gender imbalance in China has now reached about 120 boys for every 100 girls, compared with a norm of around 108 boys to every 100 girls.

In rural areas, parents are allowed a second try if their first child is a girl, but in this case both parents had a daughter from a previous marriage.

In 2007, doctors in southwestern Yunnan province discovered 26 needles embedded in the body of a 29-year-old woman. They were believed to have been inserted not long after she was born by grandparents upset she was not a boy. Doctors operated to remove the needles.

bron: www.timesonline.co.uk

China mourns loss of Japanese friend

The Chinese government expressed its condolences over the death of Hirayama Ikuo, the Japanese painter who spent a good deal of his life bridging ties between China and his home country.

China mourns loss of Japanese friend

“Mr Hirayama was an old friend of ours,” said Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang Thursday. “He dedicated himself to promoting friendships between China and Japan, and made important contributions to both countries.”

“It is with deep sorrow that we have learned about his death,” Qin said.

Hirayama was president of the Japan-China Friendship Association since 1992. He was also a traditional-style Japanese painter, known for his works of the Silk Road and for his dedication to preserving world cultural heritages. He died of a brain hemorrhage in Tokyo on Dec 2 at the age of 79.

Xu Dunxin, the former Chinese ambassador to Japan, said he was shocked by the news.

“The death of Hirayama Ikuo is a great loss to both Japan and China,” Xu said.

In 1989, Ikuo was designated UNESCO Goodwill ambassador. He had supported UNESCO World Heritage campaigns to preserve cultural treasures, particularly the Mogao Caves in Dunhuang, China.

The Japanese painter visited Dunhuang many times and produced great works based on the site, Xu said, adding that as an artist, Ikuo was also politically active.

In the 1990s, Ikuo launched a campaign to jointly rebuild the city wall of Nanjing and erect a Sino-Japanese friendship bridge. He said at the time: “To help renovate the ancient city wall of Nanjing is not an act simply for preserving cultural relics, but of extraordinary significance.

We should look squarely at history of the past war and never let the aggressive war be repeated. The future belongs to the young people, but they know little about history. The 21st century needs more young people to know about history and engage in the cause of Japan-China friendship.”

Xu said Ikuo was a real old friend to China. “I believe there will be more people like Hirayama in the future, and they will take on the responsibility to further deepen and promote the Sino-Japanese friendship.”

bron: www.chinadaily.com.cn [4-12-2009]

Will the Dragon Swat Down the Eagle?

By MICHIKO KAKUTANI
WHEN CHINA RULES THE WORLD
The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order
By Martin Jacques
Illustrated. 550 pages. The Penguin Press. $29.95.

The title of Martin Jacques’s new book, “When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order” has a willfully alarmist ring to it, signaling the rise of China as the new global superpower and the coming fall of America and the rest of the West.

Mr. Jacques, a columnist for The Guardian of London, argues that “we stand on the eve of a different kind of world,” and that common assumptions in the West — China will become increasingly like us, and the international system “will remain broadly as it now is with China acquiescing in the status quo” — are symptoms of Americans’ state of denial.
China’s rapid growth and sheer size, Mr. Jacques contends, mean that it “will exercise a gravitational pull and also have a centrifugal impact on the rest of the world.”
As countries become hegemonic powers, “they seek to shape the world in light of their own values and priorities,” he writes.
“It is banal, therefore, to believe that China’s impact on the world will be mainly and overwhelmingly economic: on the contrary, its political and cultural effect is likely to be even greater.”
He asserts that China’s “impact on the world will be as great as that of the United States over the last century, probably far greater.”
In the course of making these provocative arguments Mr. Jacques provides the reader with a fascinating account of how he thinks China’s Confucian heritage and its sense of manifest destiny could shape its return to the center of the world stage and how its appetite for turbocharged urban change coexists with a sense of the past, given that half its population still lives in the countryside.
He also makes some interesting points about how the credit crisis and banking meltdown of 2008 underscored “that the U.S. had been living well beyond its means — and relying on Chinese credit in order to do so” as well as “the fallibility of American prosperity and the shift in the centre of economic gravity from the United States to China.”
Mr. Jacques has a tendency to cherry-pick information however.
While he cites a Goldman Sachs report that projects that China will have the largest economy in the world by 2050 (followed by a closely matched America and India some way behind), he fails to give serious consideration to the many problems that might hamstring China’s explosive growth, including corruption, environmental damage, internal political tensions and an authoritarian regime (which not only limits citizens’ freedom but may also circumscribe technological innovation and create unsustainable expectations of rapid modernization in a country where there is still persistent poverty).
Such problems have been explored in recent books like Will Hutton’s “Writing on the Wall: Why We Must Embrace China as a Partner or Face It as an Enemy,” Philip P. Pan’s “Out of Mao’s Shadow” and James Kynge’s “China Shakes the World,” and yet Mr. Jacques skims over these issues lightly and dismissively.
At the same time he seriously plays down the horrors of Mao’s tyrannical rule, writing that “he remains, even today, a venerated figure in the eyes of many Chinese, even more than Deng Xiaoping” and that the Communist Party “succeeded in restoring its legitimacy amongst the people” and fostered “extremely rapid economic growth,” “despite the calamities of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution.”
In addition he diminishes the importance of the pro-democracy Tiananmen demonstrations and dissident sympathies, arguing that there is an “apolitical tradition” in China and that “the Confucian ethos that informed and shaped it for some two millennia did not require the state to be accountable to the people.”
For many years, Mr. Jacques says, China “needed the U.S. to a far greater extent than the U.S. needed China. The United States possessed the world’s largest market and was the gatekeeper to an international system the design and operation of which it was overwhelmingly responsible for.”
Cast “in the role of supplicant,” China played nice, living “according to the terms set by others” and avoiding unnecessary conflicts to focus on its own economic growth.
But as China “emerges as the most powerful country in the world,” he goes on, it will eventually be in “a position to set its own terms and conditions,” acting according to its own “history and instincts.”
So how exactly would China behave as the world’s most powerful nation?
Mr. Jacques is somewhat fuzzy on this question, suggesting that the country’s actions would most likely be informed by its sense of itself as an ancient civilization, rightfully returned to its place at the center of the world, by its grievances over the “century of humiliation” it suffered at the hands of foreign powers beginning in the middle of the 19th century, and by its “hierarchical view of the world” and “sense of cultural self-confidence and superiority.”
He suggests that China will emerge as the “regional leader” of East Asia, displacing the United States there, and that it will also gain influence in Africa and Latin America.
China will offer itself, he asserts, as both a developed and developing nation, as a sort of role model for progress, while also posing an alternative to the United States, which thanks to the unilateralist policies of George W. Bush lost considerable prestige and influence abroad.
Throughout much of this volume Mr. Jacques makes bold predictions and uses strong, even melodramatic, language, writing that “China will become the world’s leading power” and “Beijing will emerge as the global capital,” and that the United States “finds itself on the eve of a psychological, emotional and existential crisis” as it enters “a protracted period of economic, political and military trauma.”
In the very last pages, however, he abruptly begins to soft-pedal his thesis with qualified and hedged assessments.
He writes that “for the next twenty years or so, as China continues its modernization, it will remain an essentially status-quo power,” and that the decline of the Western world will not “be replaced in any simplistic fashion by a Sinocentric world.”
“The rise of competing modernities heralds a quite new world in which no hemisphere or country will have the same kind of prestige, legitimacy or overwhelming force that the West has enjoyed over the last two centuries,” he concludes.
“Instead different countries and cultures will compete for legitimacy and influence.”
The new world, he goes on, “at least for the next century, will not be Chinese in the way that the previous one was Western. We are entering an era of competing modernity, albeit one in which China will increasingly be in the ascendant and eventually perhaps dominant.”
It’s a conclusion that’s dramatically less dramatic than the histrionic title of his book suggests.
bron: chinhdangvu.blogspot.com [4-12-2009]